US Regulators Strengthen Ties with New Agreement
Derivatives and equity market regulators sign updated memorandum.
The agreement, which updates the previous MoU from 2008, focuses specifically on coordinating the efforts of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in implementing Title VII of the Dodd–Frank Act, which governs derivatives trading.
The CFTC, which has specific authority over swaps and over-the-counter derivatives, has made the most progress of the two agencies by far in implementing Title VII, by introducing swap execution facilities (SEFs) for the electronic trading of certain derivatives, swap data repositories for trade reporting, and through its work in ensuring that those instruments made available to trade on SEFs are cleared through central counterparty clearinghouses.
The SEC, by contrast, has a narrower set of obligations but has often been slow to implement rules in those areas it does have jurisdiction over, such as single-name credit-default swaps and other security-based swaps, given its role as an overseer of the listed markets. While work has been going on behind the scenes to implement a rule regarding these instruments, it has yet to emerge.
“[SEC] Chairman Clayton and I identified these rules and regulations as an area where coordination would enhance our effectiveness,” said CFTC Chairman J Christopher Giancarlo, in a statement. “Simply put, greater harmonization of our Title VII rules will enhance our oversight efforts and reduce unnecessary complexity, and lessen costs on both regulators and market participants. This MoU strengthens our joint regulatory response, streamlines our partnership and makes information sharing more seamless and effective.”
Clayton added that the nature of modern markets “demand that the SEC and CFTC work together to provide a coherent and coordinated approach to regulation.”
Although the agencies have long cooperated, there have been elements of discord in the past. US politicians have, at times, also suggested merging the two regulators into a single body that would oversee all US markets, but the proposal has been consistently shot down.
The two agencies came close to combining in 1995 through the Markets and Trading Reorganization and Reform Act, but the bill never made it out of committee. However, the question has continued to dog the two bodies, particularly after both failed to prevent the financial crisis of 2008.
The most recent verdict on the topic came from the US Treasury in 2017. In an October report discussing regulatory rollback, Craig Phillips, an aide to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, said that while some “synergies in mission functions could be found, merging the SEC and the CFTC is unlikely to materially enhance the efficiency in which their core activities are carried out.”
“Treasury believes that merging the SEC and the CFTC would not appreciably improve on the current system. Instead, policymakers, regulators, and other stakeholders should focus on effecting changes that truly promote efficiency,” Phillips wrote.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
In ‘unusual’ move, Virtu fights $25m SEC fine for data safeguarding breach
Virtu disputes the regulator’s claim that employees had ‘unfettered’ access to consumer data.
What firms should know ahead of the DSB’s UPI launch
Six jurisdictions have set deadlines for firms to implement the derivatives identifier, with more expected to follow.
Europe’s AI Act is taking shape. How will the UK respond?
As the EU pushes through a historic AI Act, its neighbor is left wondering how to keep up.
The consolidated tapes are taking shape—but what shape exactly?
With political appetite established on both sides of the Channel, attention is turning to the technical details.
SEC squares off with broker-dealers over data analytics usage
The Gensler administration has ruffled feathers in the broker-dealer community with a new proposal seeking to limit their use of predictive data analytics. But at the heart of this deal is something far more seismic: one of the first attempts by the SEC to regulate AI.
The Cusip lawsuit: A love story
With possibly three years before the semblance of a verdict is reached in the ongoing class action lawsuit against Cusip Global Services and its affiliates, Reb wonders what exactly is so captivating about the ordeal.
Vendors under new scrutiny in CFTC due diligence push
The planned cyber resilience regime will force dealers to subject “critical” tech vendors to stricter audits.
Industry divided on whether Europe should delay FRTB
Most bankers prefer to keep to earlier start date, even though it puts continent out of sync with US.